Leicester’s Commonwealth (1584)
Is the letter-string “VERE” and the cluster intended to say:
“The Copie of a Leter Written by a master: Concerning VERE, the son the Erle of Leycester
(Robert Dudley) conceived.”
In short: Is Edward de Vere considered/suspected to be the son of Robert Dudley, the Erle of Leicester by Elizabeth I — at least with regard to the substantive content of the letter?
Double “vv“s intended to be “w“s changed to “w“s.
The “u” in “graue” is intended to be a “v” , here changed to “grave“–and in all “Vere”s presented.
NOTE: Job, Chapter 20, Verse 17.
Recent Comments